Skip to content
ModelListedExternal
Download

YOLO26s RDD FRDC Distilled v2

A YOLO26s road-damage detector (4-class CRDDC: D00 longitudinal, D10 transverse, D20 alligator, D40 pothole) on the Unified Road Defect Dataset.

KindOtherVersionRevision 448b62f

Model source

Kind
Other
File size
19.4 MB
Version
vRevision 448b62f
Updated
Sep 19, 2026
Downloads
118
Source
Hugging Face

Source description

YOLO26s · Distilled v2 (small, 2 teachers)

A YOLO26s road-damage detector (4-class CRDDC: D00 longitudinal, D10 transverse, D20 alligator, D40 pothole) on the Unified Road Defect Dataset.

Method: Semi-supervised distillation, two teachers (Co-DETR + RTMDet, WBF) on the larger YOLO26s student. Best overall model in the suite.

Metrics — RDD held-out validation (4,509 images, 11,470 boxes)

ClassmAP@50mAP@50-95PrecisionRecallF1
D00 Longitudinal0.6350.3570.7200.5610.630
D10 Transverse0.6640.3450.7150.5890.646
D20 Alligator0.7270.4090.7430.6470.692
D40 Pothole0.7410.3900.7740.6680.717
Overall0.6920.3750.7380.6160.672

Full model comparison (same held-out val)

All five models in this study, evaluated identically (imgsz 640):

ModelVariantParamsDistillationmAP@50mAP@50-95F1
YOLO26n_RDD_BaseYOLO26n2.4M— (GT only)0.6350.3340.621
YOLO26n_RDD_FRDC_DistilledYOLO26n2.4M1 teacher (Co-DETR)0.6400.3370.625
YOLO26n_RDD_FRDC_Distilled_v2YOLO26n2.4M2 teachers (Co-DETR+RTMDet)0.6380.3370.626
YOLO26s_RDD_BaseYOLO26s9M— (GT only)0.6870.3720.665
➤ YOLO26s_RDD_FRDC_Distilled_v2 (this model)YOLO26s9M2 teachers (Co-DETR+RTMDet)0.6920.3750.672

Reading it:

  • Distillation helps — every distilled model beats its GT-only baseline.
  • Capacity helps most — the YOLO26s models (+~0.05 mAP@50) clearly outperform the nano ones on this val.
  • One vs two teachers is a near-tie at nano size; the two-teacher set's edge is small.
  • Cross-domain check (independent RDDC2024-ID, Indonesia, 8,901 imgs): distilled models generalized better than baselines, while the larger GT-only model generalized worse — evidence the distillation's added data improves robustness, not just in-domain fit.

RDD ground truth has known missing annotations, so absolute precision/recall are conservative for all models. The comparison is fair — every model uses the identical held-out val, never trained on.

Usage

from ultralytics import YOLO
model = YOLO("YOLO26s_RDD_FRDC_Distilled_v2.pt")
results = model("road.jpg")

Models in this suite

Datasets

Credits

  • Datasets: RDD-2022 (Arya et al.) · UAV-PDD2023 · RoadDamageVision (Silva Zendron & Leithardt, CC BY 4.0).
  • Distillation teachers: Co-DETR Swin-L + RTMDet-x — FRDC (Wang Fangjun et al.), ORDDC'2024 winner.
  • Student: YOLO26s, AGPL-3.0 (Ultralytics).

Sources

1 source
Hugging FacePrimaryVersion 448b62fb2e42d73f6c1fd209597d4e04cd465d55
huggingface.co/TamAko783/YOLO26s_RDD_FRDC_Distilled_v2/tree/448b62fb2e42d73f6c1fd209597d4e04cd465d55

Verified Sep 9

Model artifacts

1 artifact

YOLO26s_RDD_FRDC_Distilled_v2.pt

pt · 19.4 MB · SHA-256 1e7ebe925286…b141 · Hugging Face

Download file

Source excerpts

2 excerpts

--- license: agpl-3.0 library_name: ultralytics pipeline_tag: object-detection tags: - yolo - yolo26 - road-damage - pothole-detection - crack-detection - knowledge-distillation model-index: - name: YOLO26s_RDD_FRDC_Distilled_v2 results: - task: {type: object-detection, name: Road Damage Detection} dataset: {name: Unified Road Defect Dataset (held-out val, 4509 imgs), type: TamAko783/Unified_Road_Defect_Dataset} metrics: - {type: mAP50, value: 0.692, name: mAP@50} - {type: mAP50-95, value: 0.375, name: mAP@50-95} - {type: F1, value: 0.672, name: F1} --- # YOLO26s · Distilled v2 (small, 2 teachers) A **YOLO26s** road-damage detector (4-class CRDDC: D00 longitudinal, D10 transverse, D20 alligator, D40 pothole) on the [Unified Road Defect Dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/TamAko783/Unified_Road_Defect_Dataset). **Method:** **Semi-supervised distillation, two teachers** (Co-DETR + RTMDet, WBF) on the larger YOLO26s student. Best overall model in the suite. ## Metrics — RDD held-out validation (4,509 images, 11,470 boxes) | Class | mAP@50 | mAP@50-95 | Precision | Recall | F1 | |---|---:|---:|---:|---:|---:| | D00 Longitudinal | 0.635 | 0.357 | 0.720 | 0.561 | 0.630 | | D10 Transverse | 0.664 | 0.345 | 0.715 | 0.589 | 0.646 | | D20 Alligator | 0.727 | 0.409 | 0.743 | 0.647 | 0.692 | | D40 Pothole | 0.741 | 0.390 | 0.774 | 0.668 | 0.717 | | **Overall** | **0.692** | **0.375** | **0.738** | **0.616** | **0.672** | ## Full model comparison (same held-out val) All five models in this study, evaluated identically (imgsz 640): | Model | Variant | Params | Distillation | mAP@50 | mAP@50-95 | F1 | |---|---|---:|---|---:|---:|---:| | [YOLO26n_RDD_Base](https://huggingface.co/TamAko783/YOLO26n_RDD_Base) | YOLO26n | 2.4M | — (GT only) | 0.635 | 0.334 | 0.621 | | [YOLO26n_RDD_FRDC_Distilled](https://huggingface.co/TamAko783/YOLO26n_RDD_FRDC_Distilled) | YOLO26n | 2.4M | 1 teacher (Co-DETR) | 0.640 | 0.337 | 0.625 | | [YOLO26n_RDD_FRDC_Distilled_v2](https://huggingface.co/TamAko783/YOLO26n_RDD_FRDC_Distilled_v2) | YOLO26n | 2.4M | 2 teachers (Co-DETR+RTMDet) | 0.638 | 0.337 | 0.626 | | [YOLO26s_RDD_Base](https://huggingface.co/TamAko783/YOLO26s_RDD_Base) | YOLO26s | 9M | — (GT only) | 0.687 | 0.372 | 0.665 | | **➤ YOLO26s_RDD_FRDC_Distilled_v2** (this model) | YOLO26s | 9M | 2 teachers (Co-DETR+RTMDet) | **0.692** | **0.375** | **0.672** | **Reading it:...

Source context: 118 downloads · 0 likes · Pipeline object-detection · Library ultralytics · Repo TamAko783/YOLO26s_RDD_FRDC_Distilled_v2