Skip to content
ModelListedExternal
Download

YOLO26n RDD FRDC Distilled

A YOLO26n road-damage detector (4-class CRDDC: D00 longitudinal, D10 transverse, D20 alligator, D40 pothole) on the Unified Road Defect Dataset.

KindOtherVersionRevision ce0bd64

Model source

Kind
Other
File size
5.15 MB
Version
vRevision ce0bd64
Updated
Sep 21, 2026
Downloads
11
Source
Hugging Face

Source description

YOLO26n · Distilled v1 (1 teacher: Co-DETR)

A YOLO26n road-damage detector (4-class CRDDC: D00 longitudinal, D10 transverse, D20 alligator, D40 pothole) on the Unified Road Defect Dataset.

Method: Semi-supervised distillation, single teacher. Co-DETR (Swin-L) pseudo-labeled the unlabeled RDD-2022 test set; student trained on GT + pseudo-labels.

Metrics — RDD held-out validation (4,509 images, 11,470 boxes)

ClassmAP@50mAP@50-95PrecisionRecallF1
D00 Longitudinal0.5900.3240.6750.5200.588
D10 Transverse0.5940.2990.6830.5040.580
D20 Alligator0.6870.3750.7130.6170.662
D40 Pothole0.6880.3470.7370.6140.670
Overall0.6400.3370.7020.5640.625

Full model comparison (same held-out val)

All five models in this study, evaluated identically (imgsz 640):

ModelVariantParamsDistillationmAP@50mAP@50-95F1
YOLO26n_RDD_BaseYOLO26n2.4M— (GT only)0.6350.3340.621
➤ YOLO26n_RDD_FRDC_Distilled (this model)YOLO26n2.4M1 teacher (Co-DETR)0.6400.3370.625
YOLO26n_RDD_FRDC_Distilled_v2YOLO26n2.4M2 teachers (Co-DETR+RTMDet)0.6380.3370.626
YOLO26s_RDD_BaseYOLO26s9M— (GT only)0.6870.3720.665
YOLO26s_RDD_FRDC_Distilled_v2YOLO26s9M2 teachers (Co-DETR+RTMDet)0.6920.3750.672

Reading it:

  • Distillation helps — every distilled model beats its GT-only baseline.
  • Capacity helps most — the YOLO26s models (+~0.05 mAP@50) clearly outperform the nano ones on this val.
  • One vs two teachers is a near-tie at nano size; the two-teacher set's edge is small.
  • Cross-domain check (independent RDDC2024-ID, Indonesia, 8,901 imgs): distilled models generalized better than baselines, while the larger GT-only model generalized worse — evidence the distillation's added data improves robustness, not just in-domain fit.

RDD ground truth has known missing annotations, so absolute precision/recall are conservative for all models. The comparison is fair — every model uses the identical held-out val, never trained on.

Usage

from ultralytics import YOLO
model = YOLO("YOLO26n_RDD_FRDC_Distilled.pt")
results = model("road.jpg")

Models in this suite

Datasets

Credits

  • Datasets: RDD-2022 (Arya et al.) · UAV-PDD2023 · RoadDamageVision (Silva Zendron & Leithardt, CC BY 4.0).
  • Distillation teachers: Co-DETR Swin-L + RTMDet-x — FRDC (Wang Fangjun et al.), ORDDC'2024 winner.
  • Student: YOLO26n, AGPL-3.0 (Ultralytics).

Sources

1 source
Hugging FacePrimaryVersion ce0bd640549004cc129ff8d5a9b8e4e244333c60
huggingface.co/TamAko783/YOLO26n_RDD_FRDC_Distilled/tree/ce0bd640549004cc129ff8d5a9b8e4e244333c60

Verified Sep 9

Model artifacts

1 artifact

YOLO26n_RDD_FRDC_Distilled.pt

pt · 5.15 MB · SHA-256 ee812850ea3b…9cac · Hugging Face

Download

Source excerpts

2 excerpts

--- license: agpl-3.0 library_name: ultralytics pipeline_tag: object-detection tags: - yolo - yolo26 - road-damage - pothole-detection - crack-detection - knowledge-distillation model-index: - name: YOLO26n_RDD_FRDC_Distilled results: - task: {type: object-detection, name: Road Damage Detection} dataset: {name: Unified Road Defect Dataset (held-out val, 4509 imgs), type: TamAko783/Unified_Road_Defect_Dataset} metrics: - {type: mAP50, value: 0.640, name: mAP@50} - {type: mAP50-95, value: 0.337, name: mAP@50-95} - {type: F1, value: 0.625, name: F1} --- # YOLO26n · Distilled v1 (1 teacher: Co-DETR) A **YOLO26n** road-damage detector (4-class CRDDC: D00 longitudinal, D10 transverse, D20 alligator, D40 pothole) on the [Unified Road Defect Dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/TamAko783/Unified_Road_Defect_Dataset). **Method:** **Semi-supervised distillation, single teacher.** Co-DETR (Swin-L) pseudo-labeled the unlabeled RDD-2022 test set; student trained on GT + pseudo-labels. ## Metrics — RDD held-out validation (4,509 images, 11,470 boxes) | Class | mAP@50 | mAP@50-95 | Precision | Recall | F1 | |---|---:|---:|---:|---:|---:| | D00 Longitudinal | 0.590 | 0.324 | 0.675 | 0.520 | 0.588 | | D10 Transverse | 0.594 | 0.299 | 0.683 | 0.504 | 0.580 | | D20 Alligator | 0.687 | 0.375 | 0.713 | 0.617 | 0.662 | | D40 Pothole | 0.688 | 0.347 | 0.737 | 0.614 | 0.670 | | **Overall** | **0.640** | **0.337** | **0.702** | **0.564** | **0.625** | ## Full model comparison (same held-out val) All five models in this study, evaluated identically (imgsz 640): | Model | Variant | Params | Distillation | mAP@50 | mAP@50-95 | F1 | |---|---|---:|---|---:|---:|---:| | [YOLO26n_RDD_Base](https://huggingface.co/TamAko783/YOLO26n_RDD_Base) | YOLO26n | 2.4M | — (GT only) | 0.635 | 0.334 | 0.621 | | **➤ YOLO26n_RDD_FRDC_Distilled** (this model) | YOLO26n | 2.4M | 1 teacher (Co-DETR) | **0.640** | **0.337** | **0.625** | | [YOLO26n_RDD_FRDC_Distilled_v2](https://huggingface.co/TamAko783/YOLO26n_RDD_FRDC_Distilled_v2) | YOLO26n | 2.4M | 2 teachers (Co-DETR+RTMDet) | 0.638 | 0.337 | 0.626 | | [YOLO26s_RDD_Base](https://huggingface.co/TamAko783/YOLO26s_RDD_Base) | YOLO26s | 9M | — (GT only) | 0.687 | 0.372 | 0.665 | | [YOLO26s_RDD_FRDC_Distilled_v2](https://huggingface.co/TamAko783/YOLO26s_RDD_FRDC_Distilled_v2) | YOLO26s | 9M | 2 teachers (Co-DETR+RTMDet) | 0.692 | 0.375 | 0....

Source context: 11 downloads · 0 likes · Pipeline object-detection · Library ultralytics · Repo TamAko783/YOLO26n_RDD_FRDC_Distilled